Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 77

    Left and right:
  • 2571 Montgomery Street (Sheridan Place LLC, November 2006, $80,000)
  • 2569 Montgomery Street (Blairmont Associates LLC, May 2005, $23,000)


May 2008

Yes, that's TWO properties there, and BOTH have been damaged by brick rustlers. They've totally destroyed the one on the right. They've also done significant damage to the left-hand building, though; note the gaping hole in the rear side wall:




As for the destroyed building, here's what it looked like before:

July 2003 - photograph by Kevin Keiffer

No price bouncing in evidence on these two, but $80,000 seems a bit inflated, even for a house that seems to have been in good repair before the brick rustlers hit it.

The destroyed house was vacant since 1996, but the intact house was occupied as recently as March 2006. Both have now been condemned for demolition. Thanks, Blairmont!

Monday, May 19, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 76

  • 2916 Gamble Street (N & G Ventures LLC, May 2005)

May 2008

Vacancy and a Permastone slipcover can't hide the urbanity of this massive mountain of house. Made for a narrow urban lot, it speaks to a time when this neighborhood was valued enough to be built tall and thick.





Today it stands almost alone on its block, facing a neighborhood park heavily used by local teens. It's been vacant since 2000. But just imagine when that streetwall was complete, when long-vanished neighbors stood shoulder-to-shoulder. What a sight it must have been!

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 75

  • 2631 Hebert Street (MLK 3000 LLC, September 2006)


February 2008

It's right around the corner from yesterday's house. It's big, massive, handsome, isolated, has nice cornice brickwork, and has the usual complement of Blairmont ownership hallmarks: missing windows, incomplete board-up, vacancy.

Price bounce: first sold in July '06 for $118,000. In September '06, it sold again for $132,000. The Transaction Type is listed as "Related Party" -- what could that mean?

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 74

  • 3114 Glasgow Avenue (MLK 3000 LLC, October 2006)
Amazing what can happen in just three months, isn't it?


February 2008

May 2008

The handsome little front house is doing fine, but the wood frame back house was one of the May 2008 arson victims.

Price bounce: first sold for a paltry $1,000 in 2004. Then someone shelled out $90,000 for it in June '06. Then three months later, MLK 3000 has it for $96,000. Awful expensive property to just let it burn down like that!


Friday, May 16, 2008

Clemens mansion chapel roof collapses

Hot on the heels of Paul McKee finally securing the old Clemens Mansion on Cass Avenue comes word that the long-rotting chapel has suffered a serious roof collapse.

Photos and video at Fox News. (The latest video rather amusingly refers to the chapel as a "cathedral". The initial video even more hilariously confuses the building with the Mullanphy Emigrant Home, while also stating "we believe this may have been a church". It's pretty overt evidence of the disconnect between the city and the suburbs.)

Additional reporting and photos at KSDK.

Though the timing may seem suspect in light of how frequently Blairmont's properties are subject to deliberate destruction, the collapse is not surprising. The chapel roof had rotted through over five years earlier, allowing rain and snow to rot the structure, and just this week Ecology of Absence reported a bowing west wall.

Daily Dose of Blairmont 73

    Left and right:
  • 3508 Cozens Avenue (JVL Renaissance)
  • 3510 Cozens Avenue (Dodier Investors LLC, 200 )


May 2008

Here's an absolutely beautiful pair of buildings in the southern reaches of JeffVanderLou. Blairmont owns the one on the right (vacant, deteriorating, unsecured), while the left one is owned and operated by omnipresent rental company JVL Renaissance (maintained, occupied, freshly painted.)





These two stand amid the urban prairie common in JeffVanderLou's southern reaches; they are very nearly the last buildings on their entire block. The Blairmont building has already lost a cornice bracket and a terra cotta medallion. What a shame it would be for this lovely house to come down.

Like yesterday's building, 3510 Cozens seems to have bounced between owners with a sharp jump in price, from $17K to $28.5K only a month later.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 72

    Left and right:
  • 2530 Hebert Street (privately owned)
  • 2532 Hebert Street (N & G Ventures LC, December 2005)


February 2008

Watch that right-hand house change through the years! Here it is in 2002:

June 2002 - photograph by Kevin Keiffer

And again in March 2007:


And... oops! Looks like the brick rustlers hit another Blairmont house. Su-prise, su-prise.

May 2008

This property's sales history also brings to light another questionable tactic. Since Paul McKee essentially hand-wrote a tax credit bill for himself, a higher property value means more money flowing back to him if/when his development scheme goes into effect. Well, what happens if some company, say, Blairmont Associates LLC, buys a property for $10,000, then sells it to some other company, like, oh, maybe, N & G Ventures LC, for $50,000?

That's $40,000 of "value" magicked up out of nowhere. Awfully handy if you happen to own both of the companies involved, since "nowhere" is in reality "taxpayers' pockets".

Funny thing is, that seems to be almost exactly what happened. 2532 Hebert was sold for a nice, round $10,000 in March 2005 to an entity that, sadly, isn't listed in the city's online records. Then in December of that same year, it sold in a "closed sale" for an astonishingly inflated $50,000 to N & G Ventures.

Previous selling prices had not gone over $20,000. Is northern St. Louis Place suddenly that desirable? Why would such a valuable property be allowed to get hit by brick rustlers?

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 71

    Left and right:
  • 2215 Dodier Street, built 1887 (privately owned)
  • 2209 Dodier Street, built 1887 (MLK 3000 LLC, October 2006)


November 2007

It's another owner-occupied house, butted up against Blairmont's neglect and abusive depopulation tactics.



Another slice of St. Louis's rich architectural heritage, another fine example of its unparalleled masonry and red brick vernacular.


February 2008

Another piece of the city's urban environment, which needs to be built up and encouraged instead of desecrated and sabotaged.


June 2002 - photograph by Kevin Keiffer

And another property that was doing just fine till Blairmont bought it.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Blairmont update

I've done some follow-up on houses previously covered by the Daily Dose. Click each link below for updated photos, from the weekend of May 10-12, 2008.

  • 2617 Slattery has been destroyed by brick rustlers.
  • 1358 Leffingwell has been destroyed by brick rustlers.
  • 2540-2542 Hebert has been attacked a second time by brick rustlers, and completely destroyed.
  • 2546 Dodier was destroyed by an arsonist.
  • And in what may be the scuzziest move of all, the emotionally charged graffiti left behind by the evicted occupants of 2933 Montgomery -- the "heartbreaker house" -- has been painted over.

Daily Dose of Blairmont 70

    Left and right:
  • 2210 Hebert Street, built 1891 (Sheridan Place LLC, November 2006)
  • 2216 Hebert Street, built 1886 (privately owned)

Let's play Count the Broken Windows, shall we? I see 1, 2 broken windows.


November 2007

How many do you see from before Blairmont got hold of it?


June 2002 - photograph by Kevin Keiffer

You know what else I see in that first photo? Renovation on a privately owned residence. Maintenance and upkeep. Investment. Further signs of the undeniable: this is a neighborhood that is home to people, not an urban wasteland in need of demolition.

Monday, May 12, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 69

  • 1439 Warren Street, built 1917 (Dodier Investors LLC, October 2006)


November 2007

Blairmont has the building on the left, formerly an auto body repair shop for the now-closed Al's Auto Sales around the corner on Florissant. They also own two vacant lots to the left of the buildings.

The building on the right, from 1900, is privately owned. But then, it's also got windows, so you already knew that, right?

And let's do the ol' window comparison check. Here's the building five years back. Windows in place? Check!


May 2003 - photograph by Kevin Keiffer

And here it is four and a half years later, after one year of Blairmont's careful stewardship. Windows missing? Check!


November 2007

Look at that! They didn't even take out the security grilles, which would at least be worth something for scrap value. Just the windows! The intent of demolition by neglect could not be more clear if it was spray painted on the wall.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

St. Louis's Gateway Drug

I'm in St. Louis at the moment, and will be for one more day. I have many, many things to share with the world at large, and readers may now rest assured that the Daily Dose will continue well past #100.



I'd like to apologize to the residents of JeffVanderLou for making their neighborhood look like a place where, literally, the sun never shines. The weather just hasn't cooperated much; I'm working on it. I'd also like to apologize to anyone who I've freaked out as I cruised the streets this weekend, up and down, up and down, snapping photos out the window. There's too much ground to cover any other way in the short time I have.


My lovely ladyfriend and I elected to visit the Gateway Arch this afternoon, despite the gray cloudiness of the day, as she'd never been up and felt like doing something touristy and fun. This is despite my usual admonishment that it takes too long to bother with.

We walked away 2 hours later, largely unenamored of the experience.

The deeper I get into St. Louis's grassroots communities, the more unfamiliar streets I cruise down, the more decay I see, the more offbeat places I go, the more weird events I attend or hear about, the more real St. Louis becomes. It's not a pre-packaged experience; it's a living city with its own thriving, vital culture. Midget races, KSHE Klassics, semi-pro wrestling on South Broadway, Old North house tours, Ted Drewes on a Saturday night -- a committee can't just make this stuff up, folks.

The Arch is the diametric opposite: a totally controlled experience, from the instant you step through the doors and find yourself confronted by a security checkpoint of airport scale. You will find yourself shuffled and processed from the roped lanes at the ticket counter, through the lines for the elevator (where a 1-minute film compares the Eads Bridge to the Arch), up through the trickety-trock elevator capsules (the coolest part of the experience by far), and to the top, invariably packed with clambering tourists.

*yawn*

Honestly, St. Louis ain't much to look at from the air. Don't take it personal, folks; it's just how it is. St. Louis has its claims to fame, but a fantastic set of downtown skyscrapers isn't one of them. It's a city that's meant to be seen from the ground, like any humane, personable, lovable city should be.

Truthfully, the view from the Arch is best beheld by the seasoned St. Louis explorer, as a way to gain new perspective on old familiar paths. Why else would you want to look down on the Old Courthouse when you could see it from its front steps? Who would care about seeing St. Francis de Sales sticking up from the forest of the South Side unless they'd seen it up close? Why is East St. Louis so worth looking at from 3 miles away? No, the view from the Arch only hints at secrets to be discovered; unless you take in the terrifying view straight down, the view from the Arch just doesn't do St. Louis justice.

Old North St. Louis

The Mighty Mississip

It's a shame that the Arch draws newcomers away from the real meat of the city, diverts them and lets them depart thinking they've experienced St. Louis. Nothing could be further from the truth. Just as the Arch grounds are shamefully detached from the city whose historic heart they stand upon, the experience of going up into the Arch is pre-packaged and sanitized in a way that has little to do with the spontaneous and delightful world of the city at large.

Downtown East St. Louis

Perhaps if the fragmented places where the city's culture thrives were better connected by roads, sidewalks, neighborhoods, and transit, that world might be more tempting and accessible to the casual visitor, allowing them to see beyond the soulless experience of being cattle-herded through the Arch.

Click on the photos for much larger and detailed versions at Flickr.

Daily Dose of Blairmont 68

  • 2430 Coleman Street, built 1893 (Noble Development Co LLC, May 2006)


February 2008

It's quite a commanding sight, high and imposing in its solitude. That solitude is only recently imposed; a neighboring house at 2428 Coleman, owned by Impact Investments, was recently destroyed by brick rustling. Quite an "impact" indeed.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 67

    Left to right:
  • 2415 Laflin Street, built 1927 (Noble Development LLC, May 2006)
  • 2417 Laflin Street, built 1927 (privately owned)
  • 2419 Laflin Street, built 1927 (privately owned)


February 2008

It's a story so old by now that it's bordering on self-parody: privately owned houses in fine shape; Blairmont house vacant and boarded up.

Blairmont owns an additional house just to the right, at 2421 Laflin.

Friday, May 09, 2008

Daily Dose of Blairmont 66

  • 3211 Magazine Street, built 1889 (VHS Partners LLC, August 2005)


February 2008

This little cottage is in a bad way, and I don't just mean the thoughtless reworkings that have muddled up the front. There's some collapsed side wall brick near the back.

But hey, it's Blairmont, right? So who cares? Certainly not the owner.



Visible in the background is 3223 Magazine Street, another Blairmont property. Three vacant lots stand between them; one belongs to Blairmont, and the other two belong to a private owner.